10 Best LLM Rank Trackers (2026)

Intro

Picking a rank tracking tool for LLM visibility got harder this year, not easier. The category barely existed two years ago, and now a dozen products claim to be the standard, while the comparison articles ranking them are written by the vendors themselves. The top-ranking listicles for this query are vendor-written and each places its own product at #1, and one of them quotes a Profound price that Profound's own pricing page contradicts.

This guide does two things differently. Every price below comes from a fresh read of the vendor's pricing page on June 11, 2026, and where a vendor doesn't publish pricing, we say so instead of guessing. And because Crawloria's product is a free AI-visibility audit, not a tracker, we don't rank ourselves anywhere. The order reflects use-case fit, from enterprise programs down to budget setups.

What an LLM rank tracker actually tracks

An LLM rank tracker runs a fixed set of prompts against AI assistants on a schedule, then records whether your brand was mentioned, whether your pages were cited as sources, and who else appeared. Across enough samples, that becomes share of voice: the percentage of relevant AI answers where you show up versus competitors.

That's a different job from a traditional rank tracker, which checks a URL's position on a results page. LLM answers have no stable positions; the same prompt can produce different brands on different runs. Trackers compensate by sampling: more prompts, more repetitions, trend lines instead of single data points.

It's also a narrower job than the broader category of LLM SEO tools, which includes content optimization, crawl diagnostics, and schema work. Everything on this list is here for one capability: measuring AI answer visibility. If you want monitoring plus action recommendations specifically for ChatGPT, our ChatGPT SEO tools roundup covers that overlap.

How we picked and ranked these tools

We started from the tools that appear across competing comparisons and vendor SERPs, then kept the ten that do prompt-based AI answer tracking as a core feature, not a bolted-on report. Four criteria drove the ordering:

• Surface coverage: which AI platforms the tool samples (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, Copilot, and the long tail).
• Pricing transparency: whether you can see a price without booking a demo.
• Tracking depth: prompt volumes, refresh cadence, citation-level detail.
• Fit: who the tool is actually built for, which matters more than feature counts.

One finding from the research is worth flagging on its own. Of the ten vendors below, four (Profound, Peec AI, Semrush, Mangools) don't expose their prices in crawlable HTML; the numbers either don't exist publicly or render only in JavaScript. For companies selling AI visibility, that's an irony worth noticing: an AI assistant asked "how much does X cost" can't read the answer from their own sites. Where that's the case, we say "not published" instead of repeating numbers from other articles, several of which are provably stale.

Disclosure: no affiliate links, no paid placements, and Crawloria competes with none of these products.

1. Profound — Best for enterprise AI visibility programs

Profound is one of the most-mentioned names in enterprise conversations about AI answer tracking, and it's built and priced accordingly. The platform targets brands that treat AI visibility as a board-level metric, with the depth of competitive and citation analytics that implies.

Best for: large brands and in-house teams with budget for a demo-gated enterprise platform.

Pricing: not published. As of June 11, 2026, tryprofound.com/pricing shows no plans or numbers, only a demo CTA. Some third-party listicles quote specific Profound prices; the vendor's own page doesn't support them, so treat any number you read (including a "$99/month" figure circulating in competitor posts) as unverified. The only customer Profound names publicly on its customers page is Ramp.

Worth knowing: demo-gated pricing isn't a defect at the enterprise end, but it makes Profound impossible to comparison-shop quickly. Budget a sales cycle, not a card swipe.

2. Peec AI — Best for mid-market marketing teams

Peec AI comes up constantly in European GEO discussions as the mid-market pick, with a clean dashboard and daily tracking across the surfaces that matter most. Its base coverage spans ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, Microsoft Copilot, Perplexity, and Gemini; the Enterprise tier adds Qwen, DeepSeek, Claude, and GPT-5 Search via API.

Best for: marketing teams that outgrew spreadsheet monitoring but don't want enterprise procurement.

Pricing: four tiers (Starter, Pro, Advanced, Enterprise), but exact prices don't render in crawlable HTML on peec.ai/pricing as of June 11, 2026. Plan structure scales by projects and countries, with daily tracking on all paid tiers. Check the live page before budgeting.

Worth knowing: Looker integration, API, and MCP access make it one of the more pipeline-friendly tools in the mid bracket.

3. Otterly.AI — Best entry price for a real tracking workflow

Otterly.AI's Lite plan is the cheapest credible way to start structured LLM rank tracking: $29/month for 15 search prompts tracked daily across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot. Standard at $189/month raises that to 100 prompts and adds API and MCP access; Premium at $489/month gives 400 prompts. Annual billing cuts roughly 15% (Lite drops to $25/month).

Best for: small teams and solo operators who want daily data without a four-figure commitment.

Pricing: $29 / $189 / $489 monthly, verified June 11, 2026. Watch the add-ons: Google AI Mode and Gemini tracking aren't in the base engine set and cost an extra $9-149/month depending on plan.

Worth knowing: unlimited team members on every tier is unusual at this price point; most competitors gate seats.

4. SE Ranking — Best if you already run an SEO suite

SE Ranking sells its LLM tracking as a paid add-on to its traditional SEO platform, which is exactly the right mental model: AI visibility as a module next to your keyword and backlink work. The AI Search add-on costs $89/month on monthly billing ($71.20 on annual) on top of a base plan (Core $129/month, Growth $279/month) and covers AI Overviews, AI Mode, Perplexity, and ChatGPT, plus the SE Visible brand-visibility module with 200-1,000 prompts depending on tier.

Best for: teams already paying for SE Ranking, or anyone who wants SERP and LLM tracking under one login.

Pricing: base plan + $89/month add-on, verified June 11, 2026. Realistic all-in entry: about $218/month on monthly billing.

Worth knowing: SE Ranking's own blog ranks for this query with itself listed first; the product is solid, but read vendor listicles in this category with that grain of salt.

5. Semrush One — Best for all-in-one suite consolidation

Semrush folded its AI visibility tracking into Semrush One, which the company pitches as unifying "SEO authority and AI visibility" in a single platform. For teams standardized on Semrush for everything else, adding AI answer tracking through the same contract is operationally simpler than onboarding a startup tool.

Best for: organizations already deep in the Semrush ecosystem, or enterprises evaluating the Enterprise AIO tier.

Pricing: not crawlably published. As of June 11, 2026, semrush.com/pricing names the tiers (Semrush One, Enterprise, Enterprise AIO) without exposing numbers in static HTML. Expect suite-level pricing rather than point-tool pricing.

Worth knowing: if your need is purely "track our brand in ChatGPT," a point tool above will be cheaper; the case for Semrush One is consolidation.

6. Ahrefs Brand Radar — Best prompt-volume database

Brand Radar is Ahrefs' AI visibility add-on, and its standout claim is scale: Ahrefs says the product draws on a database of 386M+ monthly prompts derived from real query data rather than synthetic prompt sets. Coverage spans AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Copilot, Gemini, and Grok, with YouTube, TikTok, and Reddit tracking included while in beta.

Best for: teams that want demand-side data (what people actually ask AIs) alongside presence tracking.

Pricing: an add-on to Ahrefs core plans at $398/month for select platforms or $699/month for all platforms, verified June 11, 2026. Custom prompts cost extra.

Worth knowing: this is the most expensive entry point on the list once you include the required core plan, and the database-first approach is genuinely different from the prompt-sampling tools around it.

7. Keyword.com — Best for agencies running SERP and LLM tracking together

Keyword.com layered AI tracking onto its established Google rank tracker, and its slider-based pricing produces the lowest entry numbers in this list: the 360° Visibility plan starts at $26/month (1,000 keywords plus AI credits at the smallest volume), and the AI-only plan starts at $31.17/month. A custom tier from $490/month covers unlimited usage. AI coverage spans nine surfaces, including ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Gemini, Mistral, DeepSeek, Copilot, and Claude.

Best for: agencies that bill clients for both classic SERP positions and AI visibility and want one report.

Pricing: $26/month entry for combined tracking, verified June 11, 2026; costs scale with keyword and credit sliders, so quote your real volumes before comparing.

Worth knowing: Keyword.com also publishes its own "best LLM rank trackers" article with itself at #1 and a closing line recommending itself. Treat accordingly.

8. AIclicks — Best model coverage at a mid-tier price

AIclicks tracks eleven AI platforms (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Claude, Copilot, Grok, Meta, DeepSeek, and Mistral), which is the broadest verified model list at its price point. Plans run $59/month Starter (30 prompts, 3 LLMs), $189/month Pro (150 prompts, 4 LLMs, unlimited sites), and $499/month Business (300 prompts, 6 LLMs).

Best for: DTC and ecommerce teams that want coverage beyond the big-four assistants without enterprise pricing.

Pricing: $59 / $189 / $499 monthly plus custom Enterprise, verified June 11, 2026, with a 3-day trial. Note the plan-gated LLM counts: the Starter price buys 3 tracked models, not all eleven.

Worth knowing: the responses-per-month quotas (4,650 on Starter, 55,800 on Business) make the sampling depth unusually explicit; most vendors don't publish how many answer samples back their trend lines.

9. LLMrefs — Best flat-price simplicity

LLMrefs currently charges $79/month for one "All in One" plan: 500 tracked prompts, all eleven supported AI engines (including ChatGPT Search, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, Copilot, Meta AI, and DeepSeek), unlimited team members and projects, CSV export, and API access. No tier matrix, no per-engine add-ons.

Best for: teams that hate procurement math and want every engine unlocked at one price.

Pricing: $79/month, verified June 11, 2026, with a 7-day trial and no credit card required.

Worth knowing: at 500 prompts for $79, the per-prompt cost undercuts most tiered competitors; the trade-off is weekly visibility reports where pricier tools run daily refreshes.

10. Mangools AI Search Watcher — Best for KWFinder-stack users

AI Search Watcher is the newest entry here, from the team behind KWFinder, and it was ranking #1 for this query with a product page when we researched this list in June 2026. It tracks brand mentions and citations across seven engines: ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Gemini, Claude, Grok, Mistral, and Llama, and comes bundled inside the Mangools plan structure (Basic, Premium, Agency) rather than as a standalone subscription.

Best for: existing Mangools users and budget-conscious SEOs who want LLM tracking inside a familiar suite.

Pricing: bundled with Mangools plans; exact numbers don't render in crawlable HTML as of June 11, 2026. The signup is no-credit-card with a 48-hour money-back guarantee on paid plans.

Worth knowing: as the youngest product on this list, its tracking history is shallow by definition; trend data gets valuable only after months of accumulation, so starting sooner beats starting cheaper.

Comparison table

Prices are monthly-billing entry points, pulled from each vendor's pricing page on June 11, 2026.

Tool	Best for	AI surfaces	Entry price	Public pricing?
Profound	Enterprise programs	Major assistants (demo-disclosed)	n/a	No
Peec AI	Mid-market teams	6 base, more on Enterprise	n/a	Tiers only
Otterly.AI	Budget daily tracking	4 base + paid add-ons	$29/mo	Yes
SE Ranking	SEO suite users	4	$129 + $89/mo add-on	Yes
Semrush One	Suite consolidation	Suite-disclosed	n/a	No
Ahrefs Brand Radar	Prompt-demand data	6 + social (beta)	$398/mo add-on	Yes
Keyword.com	Agencies (SERP + LLM)	9	$26/mo	Yes
AIclicks	Model-coverage breadth	11 (plan-gated)	$59/mo	Yes
LLMrefs	Flat-price simplicity	11	$79/mo	Yes
Mangools AI Search Watcher	Mangools users	7	n/a	Bundled

How to choose

Start from your existing stack, not from feature lists. If you already pay for SE Ranking, Semrush, Ahrefs, or Mangools, their add-ons get you tracking with zero new vendor overhead, and the suite context (rankings, backlinks, keywords in the same interface) is genuinely useful. If you're starting fresh, Otterly.AI, LLMrefs, and AIclicks cover the under-$100 bracket with honest published pricing, and the choice between them comes down to engines versus prompts versus refresh cadence. Agencies should shortlist Keyword.com for client reporting; enterprises will end up talking to Profound regardless of what any list says.

Whichever tracker you pick, pair it with surface-specific reading: AI Mode tracking tools behave differently from assistant trackers, and our AI brand tracking explainer covers the metrics these dashboards are actually computing.

FAQ

What is the difference between an LLM rank tracker and a traditional rank tracker?

A traditional rank tracker records a URL's position on a search results page, which is a stable, observable number. An LLM rank tracker samples AI-generated answers for a prompt set and measures brand presence, citations, and share of voice across those samples, because LLM answers have no fixed positions and vary between runs.

Why do two LLM rank trackers show different numbers for the same brand?

Because each tool samples differently: different prompt phrasings, different run counts, different times of day, and different model versions. LLM answers are non-deterministic, so disagreement between tools is expected. Watch each tool's trend line rather than comparing absolute numbers across tools.

What is the cheapest way to start LLM rank tracking?

Among verified published prices, Keyword.com starts at $26/month for combined SERP and AI tracking at minimal volumes, and Otterly.AI starts at $29/month for a dedicated 15-prompt daily workflow. Manual spot-checking in each assistant is free but doesn't scale past a handful of prompts.

Is there a free LLM rank tracker?

Not a meaningful one as of June 2026; free tiers in this category are trials (Otterly, LLMrefs, AIclicks all offer them) rather than permanent plans. The free layer of this work is diagnostics: a Crawloria audit shows free of charge whether AI crawlers can read your site at all, which is the prerequisite every paid tracker assumes.

Where to start

Run a two-week trial on one budget tool with 15-30 prompts that mirror how customers actually ask about your category. Before you trust low numbers, verify the basics: if assistants never cite you, the cause is often crawl access or extraction failure, not content quality. Run the free Crawloria audit first, fix what it flags, then let the tracker measure the recovery.